The School Act Of Building Student s Sexuality And Gender

Political systems The school acts as an important agent of building student’s sexuality and gender. According to Pascoe, high school acts as a primary socialization institution, and is central to building gender and sexuality in the society. The school administration seems to oppose the expressive behavior of teenagers. School officials uses their power to set up dress code, rules for appropriate behavior, and also on language, in order to promote a culturally constructed â€Å"healthy† environment in the campus. The school, in this case, plays a role of government and a leadership position. They have the monopoly over the use of force, although further regulated by the federal government, it suffices to control and regulate students.†¦show more content†¦These gender specific instructions intersects with racial specific instructions and inevitably shape the minds of these students at River High, of what is masculine, feminine, natural, weak, queer and so on. Authority figures like coaches or popular teachers are also crucial in telling teenagers what is masculine and feminine. They come to direct contact with the students day to day. Their authority allows them to â€Å"cause others to act based on characteristics such as honor, status, respect† according to Nada and Warms (209). Their behavior and opinion are more easily accepted and incorporated by the students. When a coach mocks his students in a male auto-shop class for not being strong enough, or precise enough, the coach establishes a standard for the class that â€Å"boys are supposed to be strong, precise, smart, systematic† and so on. When a female teacher asks the boys in the class to hand out condoms that they hid in their wallet, she establishes even more complex notion about sex and gender (which will be addressed in the Sex and Gender section). These authority figures discourage certain activities like dressing inappropriately or sexual expression, but they also encourage certain activities. They promote heteronormative practices and they seem to reward students for being â€Å"normal.† A pat on the back or a â€Å"steppin up† for the boys that started dating or students that got their first kiss affirms

Gay Marriage, Abortion, Or Gun Control - 1016 Words

Our world in this day and age is changing. We are not as unaware as we were before. Whether that on social issues like gay marriage, abortion, or gun control. Or issues such as changes in our communities. We are seeing that our world is rapidly changing, one main issue is rights being denied to people. These rights are usually called unalienable rights, these are the rights we are born with. Women all around the world are being denied these rights. Yes, I know, feminism is the social, economic, and political equality between men and women. But, we will be focusing on women today. Today, women around the world are facing major inequalities, whether that is the wage gap to being allowed new opportunities. We are finally realizing this is a problem. But, it’s not just women in the 1st world who have these problems, its women in 3rd world countries who need feminism the most. One might claim that feminism is not needed, men and women are equal all around the world. But, that’s not the case. Yes, I won’t deny, we have made progress in making equal stronger between men and women. More and more women around the world are being able to vote and run for office, but many still aren’t able to vote at all. There are still major issues that women are facing. I will inform you of these issues later, but these issues create great obstacles in the lives of these women. They need feminism to allow themselves to get over these obstacles, and there is no denying it. Another might say: â€Å"TheyShow MoreRelatedPresidential Candidates On Controversy Issues957 Words   |  4 Pageswill be addressed are gun laws, abortion, immigration, same sex marriages and taxes. Clinton, opposes gun control laws because it terrorizes people. â€Å"We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people, hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people,† Clinton said during a live CNN town hall. (Miller). Sanders is neutral about the gun laws. He voted against decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1 day, but voted yes on allowing guns in checked baggageRead MoreWhy The Democratic Party Is An Important Part Of America s Society974 Words   |  4 Pagesrepresents the change that America needs. The democratic party best represents an ever-changing society by exemplifying the desires of the citizens as is apparent in their policies in regards to abortion, gun control, and same-sex marriage. To begin with, the Democratic Party is superior in regards to abortion because this party represents citizens more than republicans. In the Democratic standpoint, we believe that it’s a woman’s choice if she wants to keep her child. It shouldn’t be up to politiciansRead MoreCulture Wars: The Struggle to Define America by James Davison Hunter1287 Words   |  6 PagesAbortion, school prayer, gay rights, gun politics and many more are all a part of the list of controversies that divide our country. A culture war is a conflict between groups with different ideals, beliefs, and issues. James Davison Hunter’s book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, shows that these issues â€Å"are not isolated from one another but are part of a fabric of conflict which constitutes nothing short of a struggle over the meaning of America. Unlike the religious and cultural conflictRead MoreThere Are Four Main Ideological Perspectives In The Political1302 Words    |  6 Pagesboth social and economic issues. They also believe that the government should help the people directly and put into place laws and regulations to further protect individuals. They think that government should work to legalize things such as gay marriage and abortion. All in all, they see the government as a way to help those who are disadvantaged be treated equally. They also believe that the government should protect individual and human rights. Conservatives are opposite in a lot of their beliefs.Read MoreThe Democratic And The Republican Parties Dominate American Politics931 Words   |  4 Pagesthe symbol is a donkey and the representing color is blue. Republican is conservative and right – leaning, the symbol is an elephant and the representing color is red. The three political topics that stick out to me the most are abortion, gun control, and gay rights/marriage. The Democratic Party was founded on March 3rd, 1828. The founders of liberal democrats are Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They became recognized in the mid nineteenth century. Some popular current democrats would beRead MoreGun Control And The Death Penalty1256 Words   |  6 Pageseconomic and social issues. I really got inserted in the gun control and the death penalty. I was put into the category of a moderate. I can relate more to the social issues because I hear more about them. None of the economic issues really interest me. I don’t really want too much government on these issues but there still need to be a good amount. PART II Gun Control For National Rifle Association Vice President Wayne LaPierre and many other pro-gun Americans, the task is clear: The best way to protectRead MoreAmerican Politics : The Democratic And Republican Parties1429 Words   |  6 Pageswithin a nation s borders. The issue Gun Control has been a major debate throughout the past couple years due to the increase of mass shootings in the country, and the two parties have taken staunch opposing positions on Gun laws. Democrats are in favor for more gun control laws and some favor the banning of military and assault style weapons. Republicans are strong advocates for the second amendment in the constitution (right to bear arms) and favor less gun laws, as well as the right to carry concealedRead MoreLake Erie College Essay843 Words   |  4 Pageswas, (races segregated, no gay marriages and etc.) Throughout time our presidential history contained a lot of Democratic candidates in which who held office. This showed how many democrats and republicans differ with social programs, foreign policies, Labor and Free trade, social issues, tax policies. With social issues today the republicans are opposed to gay marriage and â€Å"oppose abortion but promote the right of gun ownership while democrats are open to gay marriage and feel that there is choiceRead MoreSociological Reflection1258 Words   |  6 Pagesstructural-functionalism, social conflict in the American society, and symbolic interactions. Some of the key concepts that are used in structural-functionalism for explaining social facts and events are: order, stability, authority,command, power, control, structure and role. Structural functionalism then explained why Americans manufacture industries are moving to developing countries and many Americans are losing jobs. For example, American manufacturing industries are mo ving to develop countriesRead MoreThe Political Parties Of The United States1183 Words   |  5 Pageslike they are both major parties in the United States. Democratic and Republican parties differ there ideas on major issues such as taxes, the roles in our government, entitlements (Social Security, Medicare), gun control, and most of the time healthcare, and abortion, immigration, and gay rights. These two parties dominate America s political landscape but differ greatly in their philosophies. The democrats want the minimum wage and the progression of taxes, they want

Free College Admissionss Law, Politics, and Essay Example For Students

Free College Admissionss: Law, Politics, and Essay Skepticism College Admissions EssaysLaw, Politics, and Skepticism My summer internship at United States Senator Connie Macks office, my recent volunteer efforts for a local school board campaign, and my previous volunteer efforts for a gubernatorial campaign are representative of my personal interests and long-range goals. My future ambitions and goals are evidence of my interests in and attraction to such subjects as law and politics. While many people consider these subjects to be uninteresting, I am fascinated by how these topics affect our society. Therefore, it is my desire to study political science while in undergraduate school and then continue my education by attending law school and earning a degree in constitutional law. Ultimately, however, it is my desire to have a career in politics. I sincerely believe that by being actively involved in politics, government and law, I will become better equipped to defend our Judeo-Christian faith from modern skepticism and also better able to serve our nation. Other unrelated interests of mine include athletics, particularly cross-country running and basketball, drama, music, and reading. As far as strengths are concerned, I am respectful of others and their feelings, self-disciplined, considerate, appreciative, and goal-oriented. Also, I sincerely believe in the commandments and moral standards set forth in the Scriptures and try to live accordingly, which I hope makes me a Godly example to my peers. I wish to become even more Christlike and grow to be a man of unquestionable integrity. My weaknesses include difficulty expressing my emotions and a tendency to be a little self-conscious. I am seriously interested in Harvard due to its advocacy of traditional values and principles upon which our nation was founded. This is something that my family has practiced and instilled in me in every area of my life, and I desire to continue to receive this type of leadership training and instruction. An education at Harvard will, I believe, prepare me academically and morally to make a difference for God and our country.

Criminology Crime Prevetion free essay sample

Respond to the questions on the comparative texts on â€Å"beggars† using the perspectives of left/right realism (approx. 500) 1. 1, 2. 1 Q1) Marsland’s article on â€Å"how to sweep these beggars from our streets† fits the right realist approach by assuming that people have chosen to be beggars of their own ‘free will’. He shows this by saying that capitalism and poverty is not the cause of them going begging he refers to them as an ‘intolerable blot’ as he believes them to as being a nuisance and are nothing more than parasites. He says â€Å"their possessive occupation like locusts swarming on the harvest†. He argues that begging should be shamed out of existence but blames the welfare as causing the escalation in begging. As he argues that they do not possess any morals and would advocate the return of the work house as he seems to favour Victorian standards and could also be likened to ‘John Major’s’ ‘back to basics’ speech which took place a year earlier. ( www. guardian. co. k,politics,1993) It could also be said that Marsland believes the beggars to be lacking in intelligence as Wilson and Hernnstein (1985) while looking at circumstances of black Latin Americans were not caused by discrimination but the ‘fact’ that they were born less intelligent. Herrnstein and Murray (1985) extended on this by linking low intelligence with criminality. (Joyce, P. (2006)  Criminal  justice: an introduction to crime and the  criminal  justice  system) Marsland also fits into the right realist approach by playing on the moral fibres of society, by describing them as not possessing the values of hard-working people and therefore creating an ‘us and them culture’. 2) How does Field’s view in Item B differ from the right realist approach? Field’s view differs dramatically from Marsland’s right realist approach as he accepts that the growth of poverty and the lack of work of many young people and their exclusion from mainstream society is a cause of them begging. In the regards to right realism, he takes an opposite view and one could argue that it is left realist approach as it empathises with the situation of the beggars and seeks to understand the problem rather than pushing it to one side. Field sees the beggars as victims of society rather than criminals and also points out that it’s a surprise that there is not more crime in society as he sees begging as a ‘fact of life’ and not a deviance. Field’s view of the behaviour of the beggars is quite the opposite from Marslands as he describes beggars as peaceful and not the aggressive menace Marsland would lead you to believe. Field also says that beggar’s are not behind the sudden dip in morals that seems to be the right realist view. Although Field seem to paint a pretty picture he does not offer any underlying reason for individual reasons for begging such as drug abuse or alcoholism and he also fails to offer any explanations as to why begging occurs in the first place. He also does not suggest any solution to the problems of beggar’s and he just simply accepts their existence. (Joyce, P. (2006)  Criminal  justice: an introduction to crime and the  criminal  justice  system) Task 2 Examine and evaluate key arguments and current debates on crime prevention and control. (approx. 800) 2. 1, 3. 1 There are two types of control in society: formal and informal control. Included in informal control is: friends, family and peer groups. The family offers control by providing us with norms and values and also sets the basis for our morality. Friends and peer groups teach people their role in society and how to conform, as well as socialisation. As friends and peers tend to be of a similar age, therefore individuals tend to relate more to their peers rather than the family. Formal social controls are organisations or systems with rigid rules, ideologies and morals that we obey. Included in formal social control is: religion, education, the mass media, the health service and the legal system. The mass media controls us by creating moral panic and reporting on things that are seen as deviant. Religion is very similar to family as it sets ground rules to norms, values and also morality. Education has been referred to as the hidden curriculum (Bowles and Gintis) as you learn without really thinking about it and teaches morality and citizenship to pupils. The health service teaches people to be concerned and responsible about their health. It can be seen as a positive form of control as people are encouraged to be more conscientious about what they are putting into their bodies. The legal system includes the police and the judicial system and can be seen as the most powerful as they teach people the correct behaviours in society with penalties being enforced if they do not obey. As well as control is prevention. There is primary crime prevention and secondary crime prevention. Primary crime prevention focuses on the environment in which criminal activity occurs. It suggests the best way to reduce crime is to prevent any opportunity of it happening. This is also known as situational crime prevention and works to design out crime. Situational crime prevention is a term used for a group of strategies used to target certain crimes such as vandalism, muggings and rape etc. This became a popular concept in the home office during the 1970’s due to the economics of the time and fell into the right wing ideology. Examples of situational crime prevention are CCTV, Speed bumps, high pressured sodium lighting and mosquito alarms (used to deter gang from hanging round shops). A study in Stoke showed that an improvement in lighting reduced crimes by 26%. A criticism of the study was that displacement could occur. However, the study shows that individuals in the adjacent areas found a reduction in crime due to the better lighting as more people were on the streets. There is also target remove which is the removal of object that may become a focus of criminal activity for example the removal of trend tool and appliances from commercial/ work vehicles during out of work hours, this is done to prevent theft and vandalism of said vehicles. (Joyce, P. (2006)  Criminal  justice: an introduction to crime and the  criminal  justice  system) Zero tolerance has also been suggested as a form crime prevention and was launched on the back of the broken window thesis (Wilson and Kelling 1982) which suggested petty crimes such as ‘vandalism’ were rectified quickly so for example if a window was broken in an area it would be fixed in order to give th e impression that the area was cared for. So zero tolerance meant that the perpetrators of said minor transgression would dealt with severely by law enforcement. This policy was delivered as a ‘hard edged’ manner to regaining the streets for law abiding citizens this approach could be criticised by the left realist approach as it plays on moral panics and is not considering why petty crimes may have taken place it just offers a quick fix solution. An argument in favour of zero tolerance I that police ntervention on minor offence could help deter the perpetrators from moving to more serious crimes. (Joyce, P. (2006)  Criminal  justice: an introduction to crime and the  criminal  justice  system) The managerial approach is in favour of zero tolerance as it is seen to be cost effective form of control of the identification and classification of risks of crime and is an efficient form of monitoring performance of similar competitive organizational target and is not concern with the out side world as long a s it internal goal are meet. For example zero tolerance reducing the over all crime rate. (Muncie J et al (edited) 1996 Criminological Perspectives, A reader) In 2003 another form of crime prevention and zero tolerance toward anti-social behaviour was but on the agenda in aim was to ‘take a stand against anti-social behaviour’ which follow what was know as the ‘respect agenda’. The anti-social behaviour act (2003) introduced several secondary crime preventative measures to deal youth offenders. For example in order to prevent graffiti taking place the anti-social behaviour act restrict the sale of aerosol paint to children and it also allows school and local authorities and youth offending to find a means to work with or punish to perpetrators of anti-social behaviour, for example banning them from the town centre at certain time and not allowing hoodies to be worn on the premises. Newburn. T (2007) criticized the anti-social behaviour act by saying that the impact it has is unknown and asks whether it is just a means of fast tracking the more persistent offenders into custody. Davies, M. , Croall, H. and Tyrer, J. (2010) Criminal  justice. 4th edn. ) Task 3: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of discussions on abolition in particular the work of De Haan. (approx. 500 words 4. 1 Willem De Haam argues that crime is a result of social order and believes that punishment is not the appropriate reaction, instead the criminal justice system should work with and interference with the personal live of the perpetrates of offences and offer a maximum amount of care services of to all members of society is suggested. The notion would be rejected by the right realist approach as it goes against the persuasion that perpetrators of crime do of the own free will and there for should be punished accordingly. The term ‘abolitionism’ stand for a social movement that is based on a theoretical perspective and political strategy and is consider as a radical critique of the criminal justice system and show that the are more rational ways of dealing with crime other than imprisonment. The abolitionist call for a wide variety of social responses to crime rather that the currant uniformed state reaction to the problem. De Haam argues that it should be seen as a social policy rather than a crime policy as he believes that dealing with social problems that are currently singled of as crime. The abolitionist anti-prison movement emerged at the end of the 1960 its main objective was to soften the suffering in which society inflict on its prison population this implies that a change is needed in the general thinking concerning punishment and the humanization of imprisonment in the short run followed by a replacement of the prison system by more adequate and up-to-date forms of crime control. Abolitionists also argue that countries such as the UK where their prisons are over crowded are simply ‘warehousing ‘ in order to prevent them from reoffending. (Abolitionism and crime control: a contradiction in term; in the politics of crime control, eds K. Stenson. and D. Cowell 1991) A contemporary argument for the humanization of prisoners was made by the Pauline Campbell a trustee of the Howard League for penal reform, following the death of Campbell’s daughter Sarah while on suicide watch in the care of HMP and YOL Styal Cheshire January 2003 after she experienced a brutal regime for 24 hour before her death.